Recent Posts
Connect with:
Tuesday / July 1.
  • No products in the cart.
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 22)

Briefly: Burnaby North Conservative candidate Michael Wu’s campaign is attracting the support of people allied with the Chinese consulate. James Wu Jiaming and Michael Wu were seen in a 2021 video with a group that helped Liberal Parm Bains upset Conservative MP Kenny Chiu.

Bob Mackin

Two men associated with a campaign that helped Liberal Parm Bains upset Conservative MP Kenny Chiu in the 2021 federal election were photographed with a Conservative Party of B.C. candidate at his campaign office.

Conservative candidate Michael Wu (left), James Wu Jiaming and Pifeng Hu (WeChat)

A photograph circulating on the Chinese state-surveilled WeChat app shows Burnaby North candidate Michael Wu with a group of campaign T-shirt wearing supporters, including James Wu Jiaming and Pifeng Hu.

Jiaming is executive chairman of the Canada-China City Friendship Association and Hu the honorary president of the Peace and Development Forum of Canada. The latter group advocates for the People’s Republic of China to annex self-governing, democratic Taiwan.

Hu was involved in the Chinese nationalist protests in August 2019 against Lower Mainland advocates for democracy in Hong Kong. The pro-China protesters waved the Chinese flag, and chanted slogans and sang songs in celebration of the Chinese Communist Party.

Neither Wu nor the Conservative Party of B.C. headquarters has responded for comment.

Wu’s X bio says: ”Born in Taiwan. Proud Canadian. Entrepreneur. 17 years with RCMP (auxiliary).”

The Commissioner of Canada Elections (CCE) investigated foreign interference in the Steveston-Richmond East federal riding, including a videotaped pre-election meeting between Bains and supporters of the Chinese Canadians Goto Vote Association. Jiaming and Hu were both seen in the video wearing the association’s shirts.

The CCE investigation, tabled at the Hogue Commission on foreign interference in September, found officials from the People’s Republic of China government gave “the impetus and direction” for the successful campaign to defeat Chiu and the Conservatives in 2021.

But investigators said they did not find enough evidence to charge anyone under the Canada Elections Act for undue foreign influence, intimidation, unregistered third party or use of foreign funds.

Michael Wu also attracted attention of pro-Beijing Phoenix TV, which covered his campaign office launch inside a former Pizza Hut restaurant.

Among those wearing blue Wu shirts were Canada Shandong Business Association head Zheng Yan, who led a Vancouver delegation to China for Xi Jinping Thought in 2023. Also, former Canadian Alliance of Chinese Associations secretary Shumei Lu, ex-Liberal candidate Karen Wang and Chis Qiu, a former aide to Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim and ex-Marpole modular housing opponent.

In a July interview, John Rustad told theBreaker.news that personnel from the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) arranged to brief him about foreign interference in early July.

“I spent about an hour or so talking to them about issues. But I won’t talk any further about what we discussed,” Rustad said.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly: Burnaby North Conservative candidate Michael Wu's

Briefly: West Vancouver-Capilano NDP candidate Sara Eftekhar told all-candidates meeting she will choose community over party when necessary. The nurse practitioner, however, would be subject to party discipline, if she becomes the MLA on  Oct. 19.

The NDP candidate in West Vancouver-Capilano told an all-candidates meeting that she is not fully committed to the party’s platform.

At the Sept. 29 event in West Vancouver, hosted by the Canadian Iranian Foundation, Sara Eftekhar spoke in Farsi, pledging to oppose the party when necessary.

“Some might say I am a member of NDP, and I have to be committed to their platform and listen to whatever they dictate. How come?” said an English translation of Eftekhar’s comments. “I am an Iranian woman coming from Woman, Life, Freedom movement. I have no problem to oppose the party if there is anything not useful for the community. I have no issue to listen to my community and have an objection if an inconvenient situation arises.”

NDP candidate Sara Eftekhar on Sept. 29 (Canadian Iranian Foundation/YouTube)

Eftekhar has not responded for comment. Neither has the central office of the NDP. Click here to read a full transcript of Eftekhar’s Farsi comments in English.

In B.C., there is traditionally little, if any, room for government MLAs to show public dissent with their party, its policies and leader.

In time for the 2013 election, Sean Holman, now a professor of environmental and climate journalism at the University of Victoria, produced Whipped: The Secret World of Party Discipline. The 43-minute documentary explained that MLAs in B.C. are historically beholden to their leader and sometimes must ignore the will of the people who voted them into office.

As Holman reported, if a backbencher dissents, then there is a political cost. He or she may not get into cabinet and may not receive the party leader’s endorsement to run for the party in the next election.

Holman’s documentary also explained that the real business of government does not go on inside the Legislature, but in closed-door caucus and cabinet meetings and in the Office of the Premier, itself.

Party discipline has continued under the NDP since 2017. Until the 2020 election, it was necessary for MLAs to show up and vote the way then-premier John Horgan required because of the narrow minority government that required support of three Green Party MLAs.

Horgan led the party to a majority win in the 2020 snap election. Afterward, whipped votes continued. One example of the passage of politically motivated, publicly unpopular legislation took place Nov. 25, 2021: controversial amendments to the freedom of information law that resulted in the imposition of a $10 application fee to access public records.

Then-attorney general, now-premier David Eby voted for the amendments that he has refused to repeal.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly: West Vancouver-Capilano NDP candidate Sara Eftekhar

For the week of  Oct. 13, 2024:

The home stretch for the Oct. 19 B.C. election. No better time than now to reconvene the MMA Panel. 

Join host Bob Mackin, Research Co president Mario Canseco and Simon Fraser University city program director Andy Yan to analyze the campaigns so far and look ahead to election night. 

Plus, what lies beyond Oct. 19 when it comes to First Nations land settlements in B.C.? If David Eby remains premier, will he revisit the controversial proposal to co-manage Crown land with First Nations? 

Retired lawyer Geoffrey Moyse, who advised six B.C. governments on aboriginal land use, is Bob Mackin’s guest. 

Plus, this week’s Pacific Rim and Pacific Northwest headlines. 

CLICK BELOW to listen or go to TuneIn, Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Have you missed an edition of theBreaker.news Podcast? Go to the archive.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

theBreaker.news Podcast
theBreaker.news Podcast
thePodcast: Election night and what's next
Loading
/

For the week of  Oct. 13, 2024:

Briefly: NDP and Green leaders attack Conservative Rustad’s lack of platform during Oct. 8 debate at the CBC studios in Vancouver.
Bob Mackin
Part Deux

After the Oct. 2 radio debate at the CKNW studios in downtown Vancouver, the three leaders reconvened two blocks east at CBC for the second and final debate on the Tuesday evening before the opening of early voting en route to the Oct. 19 election.

Who won?

Green leader Sonia Furstenau. She leads the third-place party, the only leader chosen by a vote of her party membership, but came into this campaign with less than a full slate of candidates (69). Furstenau had nothing to lose and everything to gain, so she sold herself as a viable option for disaffected environmental voters and increased her profile, weighed the good and bad of B.C., sprinkled with a few optimistic comments. “We have so many solutions that we could be implementing, and yet our politics and our governance gets caught up in exactly this, in the polarization,” she said.

John Rustad (left), David Eby and Sonia Furstenau on Oct. 8 (CBC/YouTube)

Furstenau needed the profile if she’s going to stay in the Legislature, after moving from Cowichan to the NDP-held riding of Victoria-Beacon Hill.

Conservative leader John Rustad needed to win. Though he held his own, he failed to make a friendly connection with viewers seeing him for the first time. NDP leader David Eby found creative ways to avoid talking about his government’s economic and healthcare record.

No platform?

“It should have been a prerequisite to walk into this room, to have a costed platform,” NDP’s David Eby challenged Conservative John Rustad.

Eby’s platform proposes another $3 billion of spending. Furstenau’s party was first out with a platform, containing some policies that the NDP abandoned as well as others aimed at redistributing wealth:

“There’s no plan in the NDP platform, there’s no Conservative platform so far. But if we were concerned about that enormous accumulation of wealth, if we were concerned about the growing inequality and the growing poverty, we would be looking at ways to actually tax some of that wealth,” Furstenau said. “We have that in our platform.”

Rustad said at the post-debate news conference that the platform would be out later in the week. He did correctly note that the Conservatives had released much of it already. Although, it’s a la carte on the party website, rather than in one handy, full-course, downloadable document.

Will it make a difference to voters? History says unlikely.

In the 2008 federal leaders debate, NDP leader Jack Layton challenged Conservative Stephen Harper.

“Where’s your platform? Under the sweater?” Layton said, noting Harper’s casual wear on the campaign trail.

Harper remained Prime Minister when he led his party to a minority win, with 16 more seats than the previous election.

Give it a shot

Eby challenged Rustad on his pre-election interactions with activists hesitant of or outright opposing COVID-19 vaccines. He also told one group that he was open to the idea of a war crimes-style trial for health officials — an idea Rustad had condemned the night before.

(Notably, none of the leaders suggested a judicial public inquiry about handling of the pandemic, a concept promoted last year by the esteemed British Medical Journal.)

Rustad: “I’m triple-vaccinated. The reality is in British Columbia, I also promoted and supported people getting vaccines, especially for seniors, especially for seniors in our communities. I was supportive of that. However, I am not anti-vax. I am anti-mandate. I believe that people should have choice. It shouldn’t be thrust upon them and forced upon them.”

B.C. Leaders Debate 2024, with moderator Shachi Kurl. (CBC)

No, he did not say that

Eby accused Rustad of comparing “a relationship with First Nations to parent and child.”

But Rustad did not. Eby misconstrued what Rustad had said moments earlier.

In explaining his party’s “economic reconciliation” plank, Rustad said “we are actually going to look at the strategic return of land to First Nations people. It needs to happen. This is rights and title… section 35 of our constitution, so we will be engaged with First Nations. But we want to make sure that what we’re doing with First Nations is creating those opportunities for success.”

He then launched into an anecdote about an appreciative single mother who he said gave him a “meat offering,” because she had found a job and was turning her life around after living on streets.

“That is what economic reconciliation is, connecting with people, making sure they have an opportunity to build a future and look after the kids. That’s what any parent would want in the province,” Rustad said. “That’s what we need to deliver when we’re working with First Nations in B.C.”

Elephant in the room

Just 24 hours earlier, downtown Vancouver, including the plaza outside the CBC studios, was the site of a roving anti-Israel protest march organized by Samidoun to glorify the Oct. 7 massacre in Israel.

On the Vancouver Art Gallery steps, speakers chanted “death to Canada” and “death to Israel,” burned a Canadian flag and loudly declared allegiance to Hamas and Hezbollah, groups listed as terrorist by the Canadian government. The Vancouver Police are investigating.

Rustad waited until the closing statements of the debate to make reference to the incident in a parting blow to Eby.

“I care about the fact that our youth want to be able to have a future here. I care about the fact that our youth want to be able to have safety here. You know, we have a government that kicks out a Jewish cabinet minister, Selina Robinson, to appease a mob who, last night, was burning flags in front of the art gallery,” Rustad said. “I find that incredibly offensive in British Columbia. We want to make sure we build that positive opportunity for people to have that future. It’s why our entire plan is about putting you first.”

Quotable

Eby: “When John was in government, gangsters brought hockey bags full of unmarked bills to B.C. casinos. They laundered money with impunity. They used our court system to enforce those same gambling debts. Government had no interest in taking that on.”

Furstenau: “It’s fascinating to me that that John Rustad’s vision for this province is one that’s rooted somewhere around 1957. I mean, he cannot look ahead because he can only look back.”

Rustad: “We just need to get rid of the stuff that sucks in B.C. Paper straws suck. I’m sorry we got to get rid of those. It doesn’t work for people in B.C. There’s a little meme I saw where there was two lines for white powder paper straws, for cocaine, and a plastic straw, and the bottom side said: one of these is illegal in B.C. That to me tells a great story in terms of David Eby’s British Columbia.”

Early voting polling places open Oct. 10. Contact Elections BC about voting by mail and voting at a local election office. Election day is Oct. 19.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly: NDP and Green leaders attack Conservative

For the week of  Oct. 4, 2024:

On this edition of thePodcast, learn why the $3 billion North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant cost overrun scandal is a province-wide problem that needs to be ballot box issue in the Oct. 19 B.C. election. 

Joining host Bob Mackin on this edition of the podcast is Daniel Anderson, spokesperson of the North Shore Neighbourhoods Alliance. 

Plus, this week’s Pacific Rim and Pacific Northwest headlines. 

CLICK BELOW to listen or go to TuneIn, Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Have you missed an edition of theBreaker.news Podcast? Go to the archive.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

theBreaker.news Podcast
theBreaker.news Podcast
thePodcast: Why the North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant scandal should be a province-wide ballot box issue
Loading
/

For the week of  Oct. 4, 2024:

Briefly: A B.C. Supreme Court judge threw out a negligence lawsuit from a group of citizens contesting city hall and the parks board’s $18 million operation to log Stanley Park trees affected by the Hemlock looper moth infestation. The Stanley Park Preservation Society is pondering next steps.

Bob Mackin

The Stanley Park Preservation Society won a battle but lost the war.

In an Oct. 1 written decision, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Maegen Giltrow refused to grant the self-represented group an injunction to halt the $18 million operation to log Stanley Park trees damaged or killed by the Hemlock looper moth infestation.

Crews load logged Stanley Park trees at a makeshift yard in the Prospect Point Picnic Area (Bob Mackin photo)

The plaintiffs — software developer Michael Robert Caditz and homemaker Katherine Caditz, holistic health educator Anita Hansen and schoolteacher Jillian Maguire — had accused the City of Vancouver, Vancouver Board of Parks and Recreation, urban forestry manager Joe McLeod and forestry contractor B.A. Blackwell and Associates of negligence. The group, originally called Save Stanley Park, said the logging that began last fall caused its members stress, anxiety, sadness and fear.

The judge acknowledged the group opted for a negligence lawsuit instead of filing for a judicial review, because there was no “transparent and considered decision” made by the park board to respond to infestation. Blackwell said it affected 160,000 trees, or a third of the park, and was necessary for public safety.

The judge said the quartet “raised credible and legitimate questions about the process,” which played out behind closed doors for more than a year. She also acknowledged that Iain Dixon, the lawyer for the city and park board, conceded in court “that being able to identify the decision maker in this case is ‘a little murky’.”

By contrast, Giltrow wrote, park board commissioners regularly vote on decisions that affect Vancouver parks that “on their face, appear of at least comparable consequence to the decision to remove up to one-third of the trees in Stanley Park.”

The only resolution about Stanley Park’s tree health at an open meeting of the commissioners was July 10, 2023 when they voted for staff to develop an updated risk management program. But Giltrow said it was not clear whether the plan was ever developed or submitted to the commissioners

So, the “group of citizens has put their hands up and said something is amiss. It may well be; in fact, the public respondents acknowledged this possibility during the hearing of this matter.”

Stumps and fallen trees near Lumbermen’s Arch in Stanley Park (Bob Mackin photo)

Giltrow, however, said what the plaintiffs sought was an untenable precedent and their application did not meet the legal test to trigger an injunction.

“I am of the view that it is unlikely that a novel duty of care would be found against any of the defendants at trial,” she concluded.

Asked if the society would appeal, Michael Robert Caditz said that the judge “misunderstood our case.”

“We are waiting to see what Park Board does before deciding how to proceed,” Caditz said.

The society, however, did succeed in bringing sunshine to the issue. The city disclosed hundreds of pages of internal reports, minutes and email to the plaintiffs. One of the key documents was a confidential June 3 memo to park board commissioners that said Mayor Ken Sim’s ABC majority city council unanimously consented to an $11.1 million “budget adjustment” during a closed-door May 28 meeting.

The city’s lawyer also said during the Sept. 16 and 20 court hearing that Blackwell’s latest contract, awarded in June, will see another 30 hectares of low tree density but high consequence areas logged during this fall and winter’s phase. Blackwell estimates 6,000 trees — of which 2,000 are greater than 20 centimetres in diameter — will be removed. Last fall and winter, Blackwell subcontractors took down more than 7,200 trees.

“Counsel for the public respondents also advised that there is not currently a plan to ultimately remove all 160,000 dead or dying trees; however, about 12.5% [or 20,000] of the approximately 160,000 are greater than 20 centimetres and the public respondents do expect to remove those,” the judge said. “Of the remaining dead or dying trees, many may not be removed.”

Park board commissioners are expected to receive an update at their Oct. 7 open meeting from staff on the second phase. A staff report said the operation is scheduled to restart in mid-October, affect trails and Stanley Park Drive, and include “complex helicopter work above the seawall.” Restoration is scheduled for March 2025.

“Should the board not approve staff’s recommendation related to phase two work, staff would halt planned operations and report back to the board, on an expedited timeline, on planned closures and impacts (financial and operational),” the report said.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly: A B.C. Supreme Court judge threw

Briefly:Inside the $250 million deal, announced just 10 weeks before the election kickoff

Bob Mackin

As the provincial election loomed, the NDP government set three red lines for Surrey Mayor Brenda Locke and city council to accept a $250 million deal for ending the dispute over who would police B.C.’s second biggest city.

It also demanded secrecy.

Premier David Eby’s government offered $150 million in July 2023 over a five-year period to switch from the RCMP to the Surrey Police Service (SPS). Early this year, another $100 million was on the table for the five-year period from 2029 to 2034.

Talks broke off while the city challenged the province’s edict to switch to the SPS, arguing in court that it would cost taxpayers an extra $75 million a year. In May, B.C. Supreme Court Justice Kevin Loo upheld the province’s supremacy over municipal councils. Locke and Solicitor General Mike Farnworth eventually announced a settlement on July 10, just 10 weeks before the official start of the election campaign.

Premier David Eby (left) and Solicitor General Mike Farnworth at the Dec. 7, 2022 cabinet swearing-in (Felipe Fittipaldi/BC Gov)

“Surrey fully supports the transition, agrees that a separate police tax is not necessary and will provide space, funding and payroll for the SPS,” the Surrey news release said.

The main financial terms of the agreement were published on the city website, but not the finer details contained in the province’s secret, four-page draft term sheet seen by this reporter.

The March 7 document defined the three ways that City of Surrey could default and trigger termination: Running a public relations campaign after the effective date, failing to provide capacity funding for the Semiahmoo First Nation to fully participate in the transition and failing to provide SPS with access to required space.

The document itself was banned from public disclosure.

In bold, red letters, it states: “without prejudice and subject to settlement privilege” and “the entirety of this document is protected by settlement privilege and must not be disclosed pursuant to the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.”

Asked about negotiations with the province, the term sheet and the province’s demands, Locke refused to answer any questions.

“I can only speak to the announcement,” Locke said.

Farnworth has not responded to an interview request from theBreaker.news.

Settlement privilege became a new tool in 2017 for public bodies to withhold information from citizens after a B.C. Supreme Court judge quashed a 2015 ruling from an Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner adjudicator. The adjudicator had ordered the release of the total amount paid by City of Richmond to settle disputes with two former employees and the total legal fees Richmond incurred.

Justice Victoria Gray agreed that the solicitor-client privilege clause in the freedom of information law was not enough to block release of the information, but wrote: “the common law settlement privilege over the amount of a negotiated settlement applies and, as a result, the settlements information is protected from disclosure.”

Quoting from previous cases, Gray explained that settlement privilege is intended to promote agreements by wrapping a “protective veil” around negotiations.

Back to the term sheet.

It said Surrey would be required to take all necessary steps to complete the full transition to the SPS, plus “cease all public relations campaigns and activities against the transition.” Additionally, “city mayor and council will publicly support the completion of the policing model transition to the Surrey Police Service, including in communication with Surrey RCMP, the SPS and other related policing and staff representative bodies.”

If Surrey could not follow the terms and keep the secrets, the province threatened to tear up the agreement and send Surrey the bill.

“In the event of termination for breach of the agreement, at B.C.’s option, the city to repay all or a portion of B.C. contributions,” the document said.

In April, Farnworth set Nov. 29 as the date SPS would become the police force of jurisdiction. It is scheduled to become the exclusive police force by the end of 2026.

Elenore Sturko is the Conservative candidate for Surrey-Cloverdale and the former Surrey RCMP public information sergeant. She said province used the deal to gag Surrey because it is really about making sure Eby and Farnworth “can save face, instead of what is in the best interest of our community.”

“It really takes away from that accountability that the residents of Surrey were promised, and that is a direct result of David Eby, Mike Farnworth and his absolutely dictatorial government and the way that they’ve treated the City of Surrey over the past seven years,” Sturko said.

Since 2020, the NDP has held seven of the nine existing seats in Surrey. A 10th riding was added for the Oct. 19 election due to population increases.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly:Inside the $250 million deal, announced just

Briefly:Surrey’s Mircea Iulian Pripoae pleads guilty to uttering threats as the Crown stays a charge of public incitement of hatred.

Bob Mackin

A 34-year-old Surrey man was sentenced Oct. 2 in Vancouver Provincial Court to 30 days of house arrest and one-year on probation after an antisemitic incident last fall.

Inside Vancouver Provincial Court (Provincial Court of B.C.)

Before Judge David St. Pierre, Mircea Iulian Pripoae pleaded guilty to uttering threats. The Crown stayed a charge of public incitement of hatred.

On Oct. 22, 2023, Pripoae approached two people who were affixing posters of people kidnapped by Hamas to a wall in the 4200-block of Main Street in Vancouver. Pripoae said, among other things, Jews should “be wiped off the Earth” and “death to Israel,” and scrawled a swastika on a poster.

St. Pierre said that Pripoae had consumed alcohol and made poor decisions on where to express “strong-held feelings about the issues that are occurring halfway around the world in Gaza.”

“Clearly, Mr. Pripoae had been feeling some heightened, emotional feelings about the loss of life that had been occurring in Gaza, and anybody is well within their rights to criticize, to protest policies of any government, any nation in the world if they have an issue with the policies,” St. Pierre said.

However, Pripoae “went much further” by making threats of harm against an identifiable group in society.

“These kind of incidents, they eat away at the safety and the confidence that all people have, or should have, in Canada,” St. Pierre said.

Part of the incident was recorded on a smartphone. A statement from one of the victims said that they no longer feel safe in Vancouver to display a Star of David necklace while in public.

“Less than 80 years after the Holocaust, I experienced firsthand a call to again commit genocide against the Jews right here in my home city,” said the victim impact statement. “Throughout my primary and secondary education in Jewish schools, I learned how, too quickly, antisemitism can spiral out of control in society.”

Pripoae apologized in court to the Jewish community, offered to write a letter of apology to the victims and said his behaviour that night was “foreign and non-characteristic of who I normally am as a person.”

St. Pierre said it was to Pripoae’s credit that he pleaded guilty, expressed remorse and regret and offered to write the apology letter. Pripoae was born in Romania, grew up in Calgary and has a history of mental health issues, which St. Pierre acknowledged, but said did not lead directly to the incident.

St. Pierre accepted the joint Crown and defence submission for a 30-day conditional sentence to be served under house arrest. Once a sentencing supervisor approves, Pripoae will be free to leave his residence during hours of employment and for any medical emergency. He must not consume alcohol or drugs, possess any weapons or contact the victims. He must also perform 20 hours of community service work and serve a year on probation.

The incident was one of the 33 reports of antisemitism to the Vancouver Police Department in 2023 after the Oct. 7 Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust.

Incidents have continued into 2024. The most recent was Sept. 29 near an “emergency rally” at the Vancouver Art Gallery (VAG) to mourn Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who was assassinated in a Sept. 27 Israeli air strike on Beirut. Canada added Hezbollah to its terrorist list in 2002.

Vancouver Police said they arrested a youth after a 34-year-old woman was knocked to the ground, assaulted and called antisemitic slurs. The woman needed treatment in hospital for her injuries.

The promoter of the Sept. 29 protest, Samidoun, is organizing a downtown rally on Oct. 7, the anniversary of what it calls the Al-Aqsa Flood, the name Hamas gave to its terrorist attack on Israel during last year’s Simchat Torah Jewish holiday.

Vancouver Police arrested Samidoun’s international director Charlotte Kates in April under suspicion of inciting or promoting hatred. Kates was released on conditions to avoid protests and public gatherings. She is due in court on Oct. 8. Charges have yet to be announced.

At an April 26 rally outside VAG, Kates called Hamas “heroic and brave” and urged followers to support it and other groups that are fighting to end the state of Israel. In August, Kates traveled to Tehran to receive an award from the government of Iran, which finances and arms Hamas and Hezbollah.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly:Surrey's Mircea Iulian Pripoae pleads guilty to

Briefly: Rustad not ruffled by testy Eby.

Bob Mackin

Leaders of British Columbia’s big three provincial parties, David Eby (NDP), John Rustad (Conservative) and Sonia Furstenau (Green), were in the same room on Oct. 2 for the first time since the Legislature adjourned last May.

They gathered in the downtown Vancouver studio of CKNW AM 980 for the first of two debates en route to the Oct. 19 election day. This one was also simulcast on Global’s BC1 news channel.

Scroll down for what you need to know:

Fast format

Not a full hour, it started after the 9 a.m. newscast and broke for commercials, with a total run time of just under 50 minutes. Host Mike Smyth did not do as U.S. presidential and vice-presidential debate host broadcasters have done — cut the mic of the leader not speaking. Because of the free debate style, cross-talk and interruption was common and Eby, the incumbent premier, was the main offender. By comparison, who could have predicted that Donald Trump’s running mate, J.D. Vance, would be better behaved in the previous night’s vice-presidential debate?

Topics included cost of living, healthcare, public safety and toxic drug crisis, Indigenous relations and the negative tone of the campaign.

B.C. leaders Oct. 2 radio debate, clockwise from right: host Mike Smyth, Green Sonia Furstenau, Conservative John Rustad and NDP’s David Eby (CKNW/Global)

Two-against-one

Was it Rustad’s middle seat, the NDP and Greens being closer together on the political spectrum or a bit of both?

Eby and Furstenau took turns on several occasions against Rustad, almost in tag-team fashion. Eby said he agreed with Furstenau more than once. Both Eby and Furstenau suggested that a Rustad government would rely heavily on private companies to deliver healthcare services.

Furstenau, however, seemed to agree with Rustad on one aspect of healthcare management under the NDP when she said: “What we have are doctors not willing to work in a system that is way too heavy on bureaucracy and is not letting it be led by the experts, the health care professionals.”

Cranky versus calm

The NDP stumbled on social media when it tried to cast Rustad as an angry and confused grandpa; he isn’t a grandpa, because his wife Kim went through cervical cancer.

During the debate, it was Eby that came off as irritable and prone to interrupting Rustad. Rustad could have been more energetic and aggressive, but, to his credit, he did not take Eby’s bait. He will need to up his game for next week’s second debate.

Instead, Rustad was often on the defensive, denying Eby’s litany of false claims. Rustad said the Conservatives will not cut billions from healthcare budgets (they’d increase the budgets), the Rustad Rebate will not begin in 2029 (it’s promised for 2026), and will not avoid enforcing laws to stop criminal use of firearms (a Conservative government would still pursue gangsters and gun runners).

The VAIDS Tweet

In the 20th minute, Eby tabled a printout of a Tweet from North Coast-Haida Gwaii Conservative candidate Chris Sankey, a pro-industry former Lax Kw’alaams Band councillor.

On Oct. 4, 2023, Sankey reposted a Tweet about so-called Vaccine Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

“I just wonder, John, about who’s going to be running our health care system?” Eby asked. “Like I think about my kid, if my kid gets sick, do I want to take them to a hospital that’s run by a government or a cabinet minister who thinks that covid vaccines cause AIDS?”

In a December 2021 fact check, the Associated Press debunked VAIDS.

In a Jan. 30, 2022 post, Sankey actually encouraged people to get vaccinated; he wrote that he had two doses and was waiting for a booster.

What’s more, scientists have found that COVID-19 can have an adverse impact on a patient’s immune system.

Research published by Infection and Drug Resistance in March 2023 under the headline “Emergence of Post COVID-19 Vaccine Autoimmune Diseases: A Single Center Study,” said: “One of the rare adverse events is post vaccine new onset autoimmune diseases.”

In Autoimmune Reviews in July 2023, authors of “Insights into new-onset autoimmune diseases after COVID-19 vaccination,” found “evidence that vaccination induces autoimmunity.” Yet, they concluded that the benefits of vaccination far outweigh the risks.

NDP leader David Eby in the Oct. 2 radio debate (CKNW/Global)

A National Institutes of Health-funded study from the journal Cell in August 2023 said severe COVID-19 may lead to long-term innate immune system changes, thus “underscoring vaccine importance.”

Quotable

Eby: “I wouldn’t trust John Rustad to run my Thanksgiving dinner conversation with the family, let alone a hospital where my kids have to be safe, where parents and grandparents have to be safe.”

Furstenau: “You must remember, John Rustad was a cabinet minister in Christy Clark’s government. They keep doing the same thing, election after election. Years later, B.C. ends up in the same place of throwing their hands up in the air.”

Rustad: “People are dying on our streets from drugs. People are dying on our streets from crime. Our healthcare system is collapsing and in crisis. People are having an affordability crisis. Our economy is in shambles. Our resource sector is being destroyed. We’ve got a budget problem. We have so many issues that need to be debated, and David Eby only wants to go negative. And I get that, because he can’t defend his record. He can’t defend what he’s doing, he cannot defend it. So that’s what a weak leader does.”

The second and final debate is Oct. 8 at 6:30 p.m. on all major B.C. broadcast outlets.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

Briefly: Rustad not ruffled by testy Eby. Bob

For the week of  Sept. 29, 2024:

The MMA Panel returns, as host Bob Mackin welcomes Research Co president Mario Canseco and Simon Fraser University city program director Andy Yan to look back and look ahead at local, provincial and federal political trends. 

The panel analyzes the latest on Ken Sim’s clash with the integrity commissioner and move to abolish the elected Park Board, the B.C. election battle between the Conservaties and NDP and the future of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau after NDP leader Jagmeet Singh ended the confidence and supply agreement with the Liberals. 

Also on this edition, hear from Burnaby lawyer Mark Berry. He is one of two Law Society of B.C. members that unsuccessfully proposed correction of one sentence in the mandatory Indigenous intercultural training material that claims bodies of 215 children were discovered under the grounds of the Kamloops Indian Residential School. 

Berry explains the resolution and reacts to the backlash before and after the Law Society’s annual general meeting.

CLICK BELOW to listen or go to TuneIn, Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Have you missed an edition of theBreaker.news Podcast? Go to the archive.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

theBreaker.news Podcast
theBreaker.news Podcast
thePodcast: MMA panel returns
Loading
/

For the week of  Sept. 29, 2024: