Recent Posts
Connect with:
Wednesday / January 15.
  • No products in the cart.
HomeStandard Blog Whole Post (Page 6)

Briefly: Bev Priestman won’t coach again for Canada, focus shifts to John Herdman. Censored summary of report by Toronto lawyer says ex-coach of Canada’s men’s and women’s national teams couldn’t find time for an interview. 

Bob Mackin 

Disgraced coach Bev Priestman will not return to the Canadian national women’s team after a lawyer hired by the Canadian Soccer Association submitted her report on the Paris 2024 Olympics drone spying scandal.

Joey Lombardi (left), Bev Priestman and Jasmine Mander (CSA)

Canadian Olympic women’s team staff were caught flying a drone in restricted airspace during New Zealand training sessions in Saint-Etienne. Sonia Regenbogen of Toronto firm Mathews, Dinsdale and Clark LLP did not get to the bottom of the cheating, however. 

In an appendix to the heavily censored, public summary released on Nov. 12, Regenbogen admitted that John Herdman, the former coach of the men’s and women’s senior teams, was unavailable for an interview “due to scheduling issues.” 

As such, Regenbogen’s investigation was “not a comprehensive review” of drone spying by the men’s program.

But that does not mean Herdman, now coach of Toronto FC, is off the hook.  

“Canada Soccer has initiated a proceeding with respect to Mr. Herdman under its Disciplinary Code. Given this, Mr. Herdman and Canada Soccer may engage further regarding this matter,” said the appendix to the eight-page report.

Canadians will have to wait longer for answers to key questions. Did Canada use drones to spy on opponents in the qualifying tournament for Qatar 2022? Will the Canadian program, one of three co-hosting the next men’s World Cup in 2026, face CONCACAF or FIFA penalties? 

A security official for one of the 16 FIFA World Cup 26 host cities said in a July 9 affidavit that “terrorism was the primary focus [of Paris 2024 security] and the concerns are that drones may be used as a mode of attack.”

Dave Jones, the City of Vancouver’s co-lead for safety and security, swore the affidavit against theBreaker.news appeal for disclosure of files about Vancouver’s successful bid to host matches in 2026 at B.C. Place Stadium. 

Jones indicated officials are planning around five major security risks for 2026: 

  • violent or terror attacks, which can take many forms;
  • cyber security threats, which can affect infrastructure such as power and water, public transportation etc.;
  • protests or acts of sabotage or vandalism disrupting any aspect of the event (from disrupting access to the event/stadium, to disrupting events inside the stadium, to damage to property, loss of crowd control, etc.);
  • fans exploiting the security system to gain un-ticketed access; and  
  • transportation disruptions and congestion in the physical sense, gridlock.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: Bev Priestman won’t coach again for

For the week of Nov. 10, 2024:

The Grey Cup is back in Vancouver. The 111th Canadian Football League championship game is Nov. 17 at B.C. Place Stadium. 

It will be the 10th time downtown after Empire Stadium hosted seven times. 

Canadian football historian, booster and broadcaster Jim Mullin, the former president of Football Canada, joins host Bob Mackin to look back at highlights of Vancouver Grey Cup games from 1955 to 2014. 

Plus, this week’s Pacific Rim and Pacific Northwest headlines. 

CLICK BELOW to listen or go to TuneIn, Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Have you missed an edition of theBreaker.news Podcast? Go to the archive.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

theBreaker.news Podcast
theBreaker.news Podcast
thePodcast: Memories of Vancouver Grey Cups runneth over
Loading
/

For the week of Nov. 10, 2024:

Briefly: Employment Standards Tribunal’s Nov. 6 decision upholds order for Overstory to  compensate workers laid-off after 2022 sale. 

Bob Mackin

B.C.’s Employment Standards Tribunal (EST) has rejected an appeal from the owner of the Georgia Straight newspaper and ordered it to pay more than $270,000 to the workers it laid-off more than two years ago.

Georgia Straight box (Mackin)

Last April, Employment Standards Branch (ESB) delegate Shannon Corregan decided Overstory Media Inc. must pay $270,819.02 to nine former employees for wages, vacation pay, length of service compensation and interest within five days. Instead, Overstory filed an appeal.

Corregan concluded that Overstory paid $400,000 to Wei Lin on Sept. 22, 2022 for the Georgia Straight’s parent company, Vancouver Free Press Publishing Corp., and then fired the staff five days later. Corregan said that the Employment Standards Act makes the purchaser of a company liable for outstanding wages, even if the liability was incurred by the vendor.

Overstory’s appeal claimed Corregan erred in law and failed to observe natural justice. Additionally, it claimed new evidence came available. Overstory argued that the sale date was actually Sept. 27, 2022 and that it did not owe the affected workers any pay.

But tribunal member Kenneth William Thornicroft’s Nov. 6 order said “the law is clear that all employees on the vendor’s payroll as of the date of the disposition are deemed to have continued their employment with the purchaser.”

Thornicroft wrote that Overstory’s appeal lacked merit and there was no need to seek a submission from the complainants or the Director of Employment Standards.

“In my view, none of the reasons advanced in support of this appeal has any reasonable prospect of succeeding and, that being the case, the appellant’s appeal must be dismissed,” Thornicroft decided.

The individual wage awards, including regular wages, vacation pay, length of service compensation and interest, range from about $21,400 to $42,700, with the average being around $30,100. Thornicroft’s order said the total owing is $217,319.02 plus additional interest.

Overstory paid the full amount of the determination to the Direct of Employment Standards in April and it is being held in-trust. Overstory has a month to decide whether to appeal the tribunal’s decision.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: Employment Standards Tribunal's Nov. 6 decision

Briefly: Company behind China-HQ’d short video app fails national security review.

Bob Mackin

Ottawa is pulling the plug on the Canadian arm of the popular Chinese-owned short video app TikTok.

In an afternoon announcement on Nov. 6, the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry said TikTok Technology Canada Inc. (TikTok Canada) failed a national security review and must wind-up its operations. The announcement did not specify a deadline or what triggered the decision, but said the decision was made in conjunction with intelligence officials, under the Investment Canada Act.

Minister François-Philippe Champagne said the law allows a review of foreign investments “that may be injurious to Canada’s national security.”

TikTok Canada’s Steve de Eyre (Mackin)

“The government applies enhanced scrutiny to investments that fall within the jurisdiction of the Investment Canada Act for a number of business sectors and activities, including the interactive digital media sector,” Champagne said.

Canadians are not blocked from using TikTok, but they are advised to consult the Canadian Centre for Cyber Security for guidance. In February 2023, the federal and B.C. governments banned its workers from using TikTok on government devices for privacy and security reasons. 

TikTok Canada was born in 2016 as Network Sense Ventures Ltd. under Hank Horkoff in Vancouver’s Gastown. It changed its name in August 2020 to TikTok Technology Canada Inc., the week after ByteDance investor relations director Zhao Liu of Hong Kong replaced human resources head Wei Hua of Beijing as a Network Sense director.

The Champagne announcement came, coincidentally, the day after Donald Trump won the U.S. presidential election and almost three weeks after B.C. held a provincial election.

Last April, U.S. President Joe Biden signed a law requiring ByteDance to sell the app or be banned. The Office of the Director of National Intelligence found TikTok accounts run by a People’s Republic of China propaganda arm targeted Democratic and Republican candidates during the U.S. midterm election cycle in 2022.

TikTok parent ByteDance’s operations are headquartered in Beijing, where it also runs the Douyin video app targeted at the Chinese market. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew appeared in Vancouver in April 2023 at the TED Conference, where he called questions about whether the Chinese government could use TikTok to interfere in a U.S. election “highly hypothetical.”

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew at TED în Vancouver (TED/YouTube)

Chew said that, with the help of third-party monitoring, he was confident that “we can reduce this risk to as low as zero, as possible.”

In July, TikTok Canada held a media presentation in Vancouver. Steve de Eyre, its director of public policy and government affairs, said he had met with B.C. chief electoral officer Anton Boegman and his staff “to make sure that they understand our processes, our rules, and we understand what their concerns are, and most importantly, that there’s a direct line of communication, that if there are content escalations, that they know, they have a backbone.”

De Eyre said that TikTok user data is stored in the U.S., Singapore and Malaysia and denied it takes orders from the Chinese government.

Prof. Benjamin Fung of McGill University’s school of information studies has repeatedly warned about China’s privacy laws that allow the Chinese Communist Party to see deep inside companies, such as ByteDance. Fung said in July that TikTok’s recommender system — the machine learning algorithm that helps decide what the user sees — is the “most-powerful and valuable component” of TikTok.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: Company behind China-HQ'd short video app

Briefly: NDP-preferred officers to patrol Whalley and Newton at first, due to workforce shortage. Scheduled to fully replace Mounties by 2026.

Bob Mackin

The countdown is on to Nov. 29, when the Surrey Police Service (SPS) is scheduled to assume command from the Surrey RCMP.

But it will not be as simple as the NDP government said it would be.

Surrey Police Service patch (SPS/X)

In April, Solicitor General Mike Farnworth set the last Friday of November as the first day that the municipal police force would be in charge in the province’s second city.

However, according to internal email seen by theBreaker.news, it turns out that SPS officers will not be policing the entire city.

On Nov. 29, SPS will take over all patrol and frontline policing in Whalley and Newton. SPS needs to hire more officers to expand city-wide.

The RCMP will support SPS under its provincial role, but not as the Surrey RCMP, because the RCMP will not report to a municipal force. Internally, Surrey Police Board officials are calling it an “RCMP support unit.”

Just 10 weeks before the provincial election officially began, City of Surrey accepted the province’s $250 million deal to enable the transition, which is supposed to be complete by 2026. The deal included confidentiality provisions.

The March term sheet, seen by theBreaker.news, required Surrey to take all necessary steps to complete the full transition to the SPS, plus “cease all public relations campaigns and activities against the transition.”

If Surrey could not follow the terms of the deal and keep the secrets, the province threatened to tear up the agreement and send Surrey the bill.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: NDP-preferred officers to patrol Whalley and

Briefly: Top election official Anton Boegman says errors won’t affect outcomes. Meanwhile, NDP MLA Garry Begg’s margin of victory shrunk after new votes discovered.

Bob Mackin

Elections BC is admitting it made several minor errors during the final, post-Oct. 19 count of votes cast outside of ridings.

Chief Electoral Officer Anton Boegman said in a midday statement on Nov. 4 that a data entry anomaly in Surrey-Guildford resulted in 14 votes for the riding not being reported.

Lt.-Gov. Janet Austin (left) and Elections BC chief Anton Boegman (X/Austin)

“My office immediately initiated a comprehensive province-wide review to determine if any other errors or omissions had occurred. The review occurred from Oct. 30-Nov. 3,” said the Boegman statement.

The review found data entry omissions happened in five ridings, when officials did not report out-of-district results that had been recorded on 11 tabulator tapes. That affected results in a total 69 ridings, but Boegman said the number of unreported votes was insignificant and did not affect outcomes.

According to Boegman, in Surrey-Guildford and Kelowna-Centre, the unreported votes “represent less than 0.08% of all results reported.”

But sources in the Conservative and NDP camps told theBreaker.news that Surrey-Guildford NDP incumbent Garry Begg’s 27-vote margin has shrunk to 21.

“The additional votes in Surrey-Guildford have not been reported yet and will not be updated until they are counted as part of the judicial recount later this week,” said Elections BC spokesperson Melanie Hull.

Conservative Honveer Randhawa beat Begg on Oct. 19 by 102 votes, but the final count turned the riding back to orange. It ultimately gave the NDP a 47th riding, a slim, one-seat majority, when the final count was finished on Oct. 28. Lt.-Gov. Janet Austin then asked the NDP’s David Eby to carry on as premier.

In Kelowna, Conservative Kristina Loewen was the victor after the final count by 38 votes over the NDP’s Loyal Wooldridge.

Judicial recounts in Surrey-Guildford and Kelowna-Centre are scheduled for Nov. 7-8.

Meanwhile, Elections BC also said it would apply Nov. 4 for a judicial recount of one ballot box in Prince George-Mackenzie, where Conservative Kiel Giddens was the winner.

Boegman’s statement revealed that a box containing 861 ballots that were not counted or reported on Oct. 19 was discovered. However, the judicial recount will not affect the outcome.

Where was the newly found Prince George-Mackenzie ballot box on election night and why was it not counted? Elections BC is not giving any hints.

“We are reviewing the circumstances that resulted in the reporting errors and will provide further detail when available,” Hull said.

theBreaker.news reported that, during the Oct. 10-16 week of advanced voting, polling station supervisors were allowed to take unused ballots, sealed ballot boxes and other important documents home each night for safe-keeping, if they were unable to store them at the local Elections BC district office.

Elections BC deemed the risk of transport and overnight storage in a private home less than the risk of leaving materials unattended in a temporary polling station. Procedures required cast ballots to be secured in a ballot box that was sealed and signed by election officials and scrutineers.

Elections BC spokesperson Andrew Watson emphasized that staff swore an oath to uphold the Election Act. Anyone caught and convicted of tampering with ballots and other election materials faces a fine up to $10,000, a year in jail or both.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: Top election official Anton Boegman says

Briefly: NDP premier sets Nov. 18 for swearing-in of new cabinet.

Bob Mackin

After Donald Trump defeated vice-president Kamala Harris, B.C. Premier David Eby issued a three-sentence statement on X, the app owned by Trump-supporting Elon Musk.

David Eby’s swearing-in on Nov. 18, 2022 (BC Gov)

“Congratulations to President-elect Trump. Americans have sent you to do a critically important job for them,” Eby wrote. “British Columbians are close neighbours with family, relationships and businesses on both sides. Looking forward to working collaboratively on our shared priorities.”

Some 115,000 American citizens live in B.C., which counts the U.S. as its biggest trade and tourism partner. Also on election night, Democrat Bob Ferguson, Washington’s Attorney General, defeated Republican Dave Reichert to succeed the retiring Jay Inslee as the Evergreen State’s governor.

Eby’s message to Trump came a week after he told listeners of Victoria’s CFAX radio that the NDP would shun some Conservative MLAs in the wake of the Oct. 19 election.

“There are some MLAs in that Conservative party that we are just not going to be able to work with,” Eby said Oct. 31. “The Conservatives under [John] Rustad fielded some candidates that put things on the ballot that I never imagined would be on the ballot, around just open hatred and discrimination against Indigenous people, against people who are gay, women, Muslims, the list goes on.”

Rustad also congratulated Trump, but said: “B.C.’s number 1 priority must be to push America for progress on ending punitive softwood lumber tariffs.”

Rustad’s chief of staff, Azim Jiwani, said he was glad that Eby offered congratulations to Trump.

“But, Premier, you owe [Conservative campaign manager] Angelo Isidorou an apology for calling him a ‘white nationalist’ for wearing a MAGA hat years ago [in 2017],” Jiwani wrote on X. “His family received death threats.”

Cabinet-building

Eby has chosen Nov. 18, the second anniversary of John Horgan ceding power, as the date for his cabinet swearing-in ceremony at Government House in Victoria.

Conservative and Green MLAs will be sworn-in Nov. 12. NDP government caucus MLAs on Nov. 13.

Eby took the oath of office Nov. 18, 2022 from Lt.-Gov. Janet Austin at the Musqueam Indian Band’s Community Centre as a symbol of reconciliation.

Eby has nine cabinet vacancies due to pre-election retirements and election defeats, including education, environment, finance, Indigenous relations and transportation portfolios.

Eby’s transition team is co-chaired by special advisor on Indigenous reconciliation Doug White and deputy minister Shannon Salter, who also heads the public service.

White, who was active in the NDP campaign, billed taxpayers $340,872 during the 2023-2024 fiscal year. By comparison, Eby was paid $213,626 as Vancouver-Point Grey MLA and Premier.

Counting questions

Eby won a narrow, one-seat majority at the final count, 47 seats to 44 for the Conservatives and two for the Greens.

There is a chance that could change.

Judicial recounts in NDP-won Surrey-Guildford and Conservative-won Kelowna Centre are scheduled for Nov. 7-8.

Surrey-Guildford NDP incumbent Garry Begg’s 27-vote victory margin shrunk to 21 after Elections BC investigated widespread undercounting of ballots cast by voters outside their ridings.

Omissions in five ridings affected a total 69 of the 93 districts, but Elections BC chief Anton Boegman said no outcomes were affected.

“Election officials were working 14 hours or more on voting days, and on final voting day in particular, faced extremely challenging weather conditions in many parts of the province. These conditions likely contributed to these mistakes,” Boegman told reporters on Nov. 5.

One box in Prince George-Mackenzie, containing 861 ballots, will be opened and counted in front of a judge in Prince George on Nov. 12. It will not affect the win by pipeline lobbyist Kiel Giddens (Conservative) in that riding.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: NDP premier sets Nov. 18 for

For the week of Nov. 3, 2024:

Tuesday is election day cross the U.S. of A. Will ex-President Donald Trump or Vice-President Kamala Harris become the 47th president? 

What else is on the ballot, across the border from B.C.? 

Joining host Bob Mackin from Bellingham is guest Ron Judd, executive editor of the Cascadia Daily News, the independent newspaper for the northwest corner of Washington State.

Forty-seven is also the number of seats David Eby’s NDP won, after the final count of B.C.’s election. Garry Begg’s 27-vote win in Surrey-Guildford gave the NDP the narrow majority, but it may not be over. A judicial recount is coming Nov. 7-8. 

What next? The MMA Panel returns, with Mario Canseco of Research Co and Andy Yan of Simon Fraser University. 

Plus, this week’s Pacific Rim and Pacific Northwest headlines. 

CLICK BELOW to listen or go to TuneIn, Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

Have you missed an edition of theBreaker.news Podcast? Go to the archive.

Support theBreaker.news for as low as $2 a month on Patreon. Find out how. Click here.

theBreaker.news Podcast
theBreaker.news Podcast
thePodcast: Election fever on both sides of the Peace Arch
Loading
/

For the week of Nov. 3, 2024:

Briefly: More calls for public inquiry into Metro Vancouver’s $4 billion sewage plant controversy, which is supposed to be finished by 2030.

Bob Mackin

Could it take longer than 2030 for the entire North Shore Wastewater Treatment Plant project to be completed?

Metro Vancouver’s August progress report to the federal government said contractor AECOM’s design was 95% finished, and expected to be complete in November. But the construction, now under PCL, was stalled at 32%.

(Metro Vancouver/FOI)

“Metro Vancouver will continue with the amended early works construction scope until a fully executed construction contract is in place to complete the project,” said the bi-annual report to the federal government, obtained by theBreaker.news under freedom of information. “At that time, Metro Vancouver will be able to provide an updated cost and schedule for the project.”

In March, Metro Vancouver revealed that it would cost $3.86 billion to deliver by 2030. The price tag for the new sewage plant was supposed to be just $700 million for 2020.

Although construction and commissioning are expected to be complete in 2030, the report said that “minor connecting conveyance works are scheduled for subsequent years” and decommissioning and remediation of the 1961-opened Lions Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant site will follow.

The month before Metro Vancouver went public with the overrun and delay, it told the federal government in the February update that the revised July 2026 completion target was under review.

July’s progress report to the B.C. government said that $537 million had been spent so far. More than half of that, $311.17 million, was listed under design-build costs. Other major costs included $69.3 million for conveyance design builder and $65.3 million for the designer.

The federal government agreed in 2016 to fund $212.3 million of the original $700 million budget. The province joined in with $193 million in 2017. Construction officially started Jan. 11, 2019.

In 2021, after pandemic delays, disputes with design-build contractor Acciona and an upgrade to tertiary treatment, Metro Vancouver hiked the budget to $1.058 billion and delayed completion to 2024.

Neither Ottawa nor Victoria have come to the table with additional funding. For now, the overruns are on the shoulders of Metro Vancouver ratepayers who will see an average 25.3% increase to their utility bills next year, to $875.

Indigestion

The progress report to the province said that one of the major works around the site is removal of excess rebar caused by Acciona

“PCL and AECOM have been collaborating to identify rebar congestion that has led to poor concrete consolidation by the previous contractor, and removing select rebar in line with AECOM’s updated 90% design drawings or issued for construction drawings where available. Rebar congestion has been minimized in the solids dewatering building, primary sedimentation tanks, activated sludge tanks, and secondary clarifier areas.”

Few workers can be seen on-site, however preparations were made for hundreds to someday arrive.

(Metro Vancouver/FOI)

The report said that the craft lunch room construction was nearing completion to accommodate 650 workers including, offices, furniture, ventilation and lighting. Modifications were underway to accommodate 220 vehicles in a parking lot.

The two tallest structures are officially known as Building 71A and Building 71B, the north and south digesters, respectively.

PCL discovered poor concrete consolidation on the north digester’s roof. Concrete demolition was completed by August and installation of falsework — or shoring — commenced. Scaffolding had been completed on the south digester.

Throughout summer, Premier David Eby resisted calls from a group of municipal councillors and the North Shore Neighbourhoods Alliance to forward the matter to the Inspector of Municipalities for a public inquiry.

In September, the week before the provincial election period began, Metro Vancouver retained retired appeal court judge John Hunter to advise the board on how to conduct an independent audit without compromising the lawsuit against Acciona.

The Spanish company sued for $250 million after its 2022 firing. Metro Vancouver countersued for $500 million.

A North Vancouver District councillor calls the process under Hunter inadequate, ineffective and limited in scope. NDP-aligned Catherine Pope is tabling a motion at the Nov. 4 council meeting that seeks support for an independent public inquiry.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: More calls for public inquiry into

Briefly: Document outlined general threats to B.C.’s 2024 election and offered advice to prevent, mitigate harm.

Bob Mackin

Officials feared protesters would violently disrupt British Columbia’s Oct. 19 election.

A document titled “Direct Action Incidents Guidelines and Procedures for Provincial Election Campaigns” was published on the Elections BC website. It was produced by the Policing and Security Branch of the Ministry of Public Safety and Solicitor General, in consultation with various B.C. police forces and Elections BC.

Elections BC sign (Mackin)

The document said demonstrations were a risk to the provincial election, though it did not name specific groups or causes.

“While elections allow members of the public to express their political preferences at the ballot box, direct action refers to taking political action through activities that are outside the formal processes and structures of government,” the document said.

“While most demonstrations proceed in alignment with their political context and remain peaceful in nature, all political candidates and their staff should be aware of the following risks associated with direct action incidents.”

If any serious incidents took place, and if any are under investigation, officials are keeping quiet. B.C. RCMP senior media relations officer S. Sgt. Kris Clark said “your inquiry is best directed to Elections BC.”

A spokesperson for Elections BC said it published the document as a courtesy to the Solicitor General’s office.

“If candidates or parties received threats and notified Elections BC, they were informed to make a report to the local police of jurisdiction,” said Elections BC senior director of communications Andrew Watson. “We do not track the number of notifications we receive of this nature as it is outside of our mandate to respond to them.”

Risks and advice

Risks mentioned in the document included violent demonstrations or counter-demonstrations, vandalism and disruption at a candidate’s personal residence. The guide advised parties and candidates to vigilantly control access and verify identification in order to prevent an office occupation. They were told to have a safety plan in place, with input of local police, and discuss an emergency communication and evacuation plan with co-workers.

The guide also said police endeavour to “identify and connect with protest organizers in advance of planned protests. Their ability to do so varies depending on which groups and/or individuals leading those groups are involved.”

Sometimes a group may use private or encrypted communication channels to finalize event details, frustrating the police response.

In the event of a protest, the guide prioritized attempts to maintain a civil, non-confrontational tone, but recommended avoiding passing through a group of protesters in front of a door or gate. If possible, it suggested demonstrators be advised of the need for employees to maintain normal duties and office operations without disruption.

“Depending on the protocols set out in a pre-established response plan and/or the advice of police, meet with a representative of the demonstrators to determine the demands or objectives of the demonstration.”

The guide also offered advice in case of “online intimidation, insults, racial slurs and/or hate speech” and gave links to resources. It said staff should be briefed on the connection between “online activity/discourse/rhetoric and the mobilization towards direct protest action.”

Protests aplenty

Anti-Israel protesters outside Mayor Ken Sim’s house on Sunday (Instagram/Samidounvan)

B.C. has seen waves of unrest over the last five years, by foreign-funded, radical environmentalists (Extinction Rebellion and Save Old Growth), proponents of the Chinese Communist Party, groups against Israel and India, and opponents of COVID-19 vaccination mandates and the teaching of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) lessons in schools.

Police have responded to highway and bridge blockades, marches around hospitals and schools, and occupations at the local offices of federal and provincial lawmakers and municipal council meetings. Charlotte Kates, international director of pro-Hamas Samidoun, was among the anti-Israel protest mob that surrounded Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and chased him out of Vij’s restaurant in Vancouver on Nov. 14, 2023.

Protesters involved with Samidoun also descended on Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim’s residential property on the last Sunday of January. Samidoun was a driving force behind the ousting of Jewish minister Selina Robinson from the B.C. NDP cabinet in February. During Hallowe’en, a vandal spray-painted insults directed at Sim and his family, in English and Chinese, across his garage door. The graffiti also included “Free Palestine.” 

On Oct. 15, federal authorities in Canada and the U.S. declared Samidoun, an affiliate of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, a banned terrorist entity.

Meanwhile, in Washington State and Oregon, where elections are conducted by mail, the FBI is investigating two arson attacks at ballot drop boxes in Portland and Vancouver, Wash. ahead of the Nov. 5 elections. The New York Times reported devices police found at the crime scenes contained the words “Free Gaza.”

In B.C., elections are still held primarily in-person.

theBreaker.news reported that, during the Oct. 10-16 week of advanced voting, polling station supervisors were allowed to take unused ballots, sealed ballot boxes and other important documents home each night for safe-keeping, if they were unable to store them at the local Elections BC district office.

Elections BC deemed the risk of transport and overnight storage in a private home less than the risk of leaving materials unattended in a temporary polling station. Watson said that cast ballots were secured in a ballot box that was sealed and signed by election officials and scrutineers.

Watson emphasized that staff swore an oath to uphold the Election Act. Anyone caught and convicted of tampering with ballots and other election materials faces a fine up to $10,000, a year in jail or both.

NEW: Subscribe to theBreaker.news on Substack. Find out how: Click here

Briefly: Document outlined general threats to B.C.'s